Search  

 

[home]>[programmes]>[orientation course]>report>wise heads

Wise Heads

A consultative meeting on the Third South Asian Human Rights and Peace Studies Orientation Course was held in Delhi on 5 April 2002. Present in the meeting were C.R. Abrar, Ashok Agrwaal, Rajeev Bhargava, Tapan K. Bose, Sanjay Chaturvedi, E. Deenadayalan, Ram Narayan Kumar, Rita Manchanda, Navita Mahajan, Shobhit Mahajan, Mohanlal Panda, Jehan Perera, Aswini Kr. Ray, Ranabir Samaddar, Kapil Shrestha, and Priyankar Upadhyay. Tapan K. Bose chaired the meeting.

The meeting deliberated on:

  • The reports on the past two orientation courses and discussion (selection of participants, course structure, themes, and results of the past two courses)
  • Structure of the third orientation course, its features and link-up with the peace audit exercise of SAFHR
  • The theme and sub-themes of the third orientation course
  • And, the Course reader

Structure of the course: In the discussion on the past two courses several suggestions came up and the consensus among the members present was that the following suggestions should be followed in further developing the design of the course:

One part of the course could be a travelling element - such as an exhibition, or a peace studies group travelling to different places as a form of fieldwork, etc.

  • There should be such courses at smaller scale and local level.
  • The distance education part of the course should be more interactive, carefully monitored and supervised.
  • There should be an inbuilt structure of follow-up.
  • After three courses SAFHR can have a stock-taking in terms of syllabus, design, follow-up measures, and results.
  • In notifying the course, attention be paid to notify the course on an even wider scale, and reach the notification to more peace and human rights personalities, institutions, and movements, general universities, and peace studies journals.
  • Encouragement has to be provided to ex-participants to arrange local consultations on issues of human rights and peace studies, and organize panel discussions, institute courses at local levels, and help in making the alumni forum productive.
  • The peace studies programme of SAFHR should interact more with other programmes in form of inputs, participation, follow-up measures, and other operational links.
  • The course should remain of high standard, and empirical details of issues be provided in a way that the critical skills of the participants improve.
  • An on-line system of interaction will be developed as part of the programme.
  • In terms of making the course more participatory, the course can have provision for group papers and group work on problems.
  • The profile of the course should remain foundational, rich in terms of perspective, and interactive.
  • The introductory section in the course in form of a separate module or introductory lectures should detail out the specifics of the theme of the course.
  • Similarly the system of tutorials may be introduced to help the participants with more complex and difficult themes.
  • The audit exercise can be integrated with the course by paying more attention to participants in the audit exercise, the findings of the said exercise in terms making the audit reports part of the syllabus, and taking the basics of the peace studies course into the framework of the work on audit.

The theme and sub-themes: In the attempt to make the course strong in foundational themes, while at the same time remaining relevant to current situation, it was suggested that part of the syllabus should remain constant, dealing with basics, and forming the core of the syllabus, while another part may be revised regularly in order to deal with problems and issues of the time. Thus it was advised that in the third course the basics of the earlier two courses be retained while adding new dimensions to the concerns of the course. Thus basic issues of human rights and peace, human rights laws, and the problematic of universality and particularity of human rights will be in this course also, as they were in the earlier two courses. In adding the dimension of "War, Violence, Intervention, and Their Impact on Democracy in South Asia" as the particular theme of this year's course, it was advised that care about combining the constant themes and the particular theme of this year's course be maintained. In the context of the concept note on this year's theme, circulated earlier among the members, it was suggested that the deliberations in the course on the said theme should pay attention to following dimensions of the situation:

  • The element of "excess" in the war and war-like situation existing today that is causing a deficit of human rights, decline of human rights institutions, and the state's capacity and willingness to protect human rights in this region and wide across the globe.
  • The situation of minorities, immigrants, women, and different vulnerable sections of society.
  • Various scenarios of intervention and laws of war and peace.
  • The relation of violence, communalism, and war against terrorism in the context of killings and persecution of minorities in states of South Asia.
  • Cartographies of violence, and the paradox of the universality of the ideal of rights and the state centric institutionalization of human rights.
  • The prevailing culture of impunity in the region as against the desired culture of responsibility.
  • The notion of responsibility - shared responsibility, collective responsibility, individual responsibility, graded responsibility.
  • Human rights law, humanitarian law - convergence and divergence.
  • Roots of the current crisis - attacks against civil liberties, other rights, downgrading of rights institutions.
  • The need to question the adequacy of our understanding of certain wars, particularly the "dirty wars", and the need to integrate in the current context the arguments of human rights in the broad discourse of justice.

The Course reader: The discussion on the Course Reader took note of the care and labour that went into the making of the reader for the second orientation course. It was also noted how the reader could carry the participants in a journey through the histories, issues, problems and practices related to peace, justice, and human rights. It was also noted that the participants would be realizing the value of the reader as they would become more active, critical, and contemplative in the process of their peace activism. The reader is not for one-time use but is to be a companion for time to come long after the course is over and participants have gone back to their respective places and stations of work. The meeting was of unanimous view that preparation of a suitable reader called for separate attention and exercise. It was suggested:

  • Preparing such a reader is a participatory exercise.
  • In the course of preparing the reader, SAFHR may be able to gradually build up an archive of documents.
  • The reader will be effective for a tutorial system in such a short and intense orientation course.
  • In preparing the reader attention should be paid to having material from non-European sources.
  • There can be a media section in the reader as part of promoting media literacy.
  • The reader should be based on the principle of many sided presentation of writings on a problematic of peace and human rights.
  • The reader is a developing project, and three years of holding the orientation course on an annual basis and organizing the syllabus for each year's course should now lead to an exercise of preparing a durable syllabus and an appropriate reader.
  • This year's course material will include SAFHR papers specially authored for the course, as was done last year.
 

PROGRAMMES

 HOME       SITE MAP       FEEDBACK       CONTACT US